Custom API development
REST and GraphQL APIs designed around the operations a business actually performs, versioned, authenticated and documented for the teams that will consume them.
Enterprise system integration for businesses whose software has grown into separate islands: REST and GraphQL API development, third-party API integration, legacy system modernization and the backend services that hold them together — designed so a failure is visible, retryable and survivable.
An integration is not a script that runs at night. It is a contract between two systems that will both keep changing.
REST and GraphQL APIs designed around the operations a business actually performs, versioned, authenticated and documented for the teams that will consume them.
Payment providers, carriers, marketplaces, messaging, accounting and government e-invoicing endpoints, wrapped so their outages do not become your outages.
Queues, idempotency keys, dead-letter handling and reconciliation jobs — the difference between an integration that works and one that works on the sixth month.
Putting a documented API in front of a system nobody wants to touch, so new software can be built without a rewrite that the business cannot afford to pause for.
The services that sit between systems: transformation, validation, scheduling and the observability that tells an operator what moved and what did not.
Almost always paid in someone's afternoon, every day, until the integration exists.
Once in the shop system, once in accounting, once in a spreadsheet nobody officially owns.
Two systems that both hold products, prices and customers, with no agreed contract between them.
A provider ships a new version, the nightly job fails silently, and the gap is found a week later.
Sales, stock and finance each produce a different number for the same week, and the meeting is about which one to believe.
It runs the operation, the person who wrote it left, and every new requirement has to route around it.
Doubling the orders would mean doubling the people who retype them.
An integration layer between commerce, ERP, warehouse and accounting — one source of truth per field, and a reconciliation job that proves it.
PLC lines through a gateway into cloud dashboards — an integration where one end of the wire is a machine.
Read the case study →A multi-tenant platform whose booking, pricing and operations modules talk over internal APIs rather than shared tables.
Read the case study →Both, and usually in the same project. Most integrations need a new API on one side, an adapter on the other, and a service in the middle that owns retries and reconciliation.
The work is queued rather than fired directly. Messages carry an idempotency key, failures move to a dead-letter queue with the reason attached, and a scheduled reconciliation compares both sides so nothing quietly disappears.
Yes. A common arrangement is that I own the integration layer and its architecture while your team owns the product they already know — with weekly deployments and a written changelog so nobody has to ask what changed.
Tell me what you are trying to build, automate or scale. You get a straight answer on fit within a day — and a name to call if it is not me.